VSA Submits Public Safety Amendments to City Officials to
Prevent Boston
Marathon-like Bombing at Venice Beach and
Other Major City Venues
VSA Also Calls for Amendment of the “No Sitting, Lying or
Sleeping” Ordinance to Provide a Buffer Zone for Residents
The Venice Stakeholders
Association today forwarded to City officials a petition from residents
supporting public safety amendments to protect Venice Beach and other major outdoor event
venues in Los Angeles
from a Boston Marathon-like
backpack bombing. The package of
amendments also would establish a buffer zone around residences and hotels
throughout the City in which the City’s “no sitting, lying or sleeping”
ordinance could be enforced.
“Currently
Venice Beach, with an estimated 16 million visitors a year, is at risk of
attack due to the ease with which anyone can leave unattended baggage for
hours,” said Mark Ryavec, the president of the VSA. “Unattended luggage is not allowed at LAX or
Union Station and it also should not be allowed anywhere in the City where huge
numbers of people congregate,” Ryavec said. “Our amendment would plug this hole
in City law.”
Also
included in the package is an amendment that would re-establish the City’s “no
sitting, lying or sleeping on public rights-of-way” ordinance within 125 feet
of any residence or hotel. The ordinance
has been largely unenforced for eight years as part of the “Jones Settlement,”
an agreement between the City and several homeless individuals in Downtown’s
“Skid Row” neighborhood to temporarily hold off enforcement between 9 PM and 6
AM until additional housing is built to house the homeless.
Jack
Hoffmann, a Market Street
resident, said the application of the Jones Settlement to areas beyond Skid Row
has created a nightmare in Venice,
especially on and near Ocean Front Walk, which is known as the Venice Boardwalk.
“By encouraging the establishment of large encampments of mentally ill,
drug and alcohol addicted, and criminally-inclined individuals living on our
doorsteps, the City has endangered residents, visitors and those living on
the street; abandoning people helps no one,” Hoffmann said.
“Instead
of forcing people to live with this danger and bear the burden the City will
not accept, in Venice or elsewhere,
the City should at least create a buffer zone around residences and hotels
citywide where these encampments cannot remain while a comprehensive solution
is developed.” Hoffmann said.
According
to Ryavec the Jones Settlement does not preclude the City from passing – and
then fully enforcing – a new ordinance that more narrowly tailors the
sitting/lying/sleeping ban to those areas closest to residences and
hotels. “The settlement specifically
states that the City’s agreement to temporarily not enforce the ban from 9 PM
to 6 AM does not apply to any ordinance adopted in the future,” Ryavec said.
Ryavec
also noted that even after the City finishes building the 1,250 housing units
required by the Jones Settlement, any enforcement of the present
sitting/lying/sleeping ban could invite a new lawsuit since the City still would
not have enough shelter beds to accommodate all those living on the
street. “If the VSA’s amendment is
adopted, and the absolute ban is challenged again in court,” said Ryavec, “the
narrower ban has a better chance of surviving because it is tailored specifically
to protect residents and visitors where they live and sleep.”
In the
letter to City officials, VSA said that by not enforcing the
sitting/lying/sleeping ban the City has allowed a lawless situation to develop
along the Venice Boardwalk and on nearby residential streets, as hordes of
aggressive, opportunistic transients attracted by mild weather and the easy
availability of drugs camp out on private and public property, committing a
constant stream of assaults, thefts and burglaries, defecating and urinating in
public, and harassing anyone who gets in their way . (Ryavec noted that
residents and visitors are not the only victims of these conditions; there is
also a record of brutal transient-on-transient assaults.)
Ryavec
referred in particular to a recent case that drew international media
attention, in which a transient invaded a home two blocks from the beach while
the resident was home, forcing her to hide on her roof until the police arrived. http://www.cnn.com/2014/09/25/us/california-venice-roof-intruder/
David Krintzman, a walk street
resident near the Ocean Front Walk encampments, said a robbery of his
neighbor’s apartment had recently been committed in broad daylight by a
transient who absconded with the neighbor’s laptop, clothes and other
possessions.
“From a neighborhood safety
perspective, I am very concerned about the transient encampment the City has
permitted to exist at the grassy knoll and
pagodas at the foot of Dudley Avenue
as well as the encampments which extend several blocks north,” Krintzman said.
In
another recent incident, three transients from Oklahoma stole a watch from a visitor while
he was changing clothes in a Venice Beach
restroom. When the visitor tried to take the watch back, the thieves threatened
him with a butcher knife and pepper spray.
“The transients told police they were here because they had heard that Venice
was a great place to be homeless,” Ryavec said.
“This
culture of lawlessness has to stop and residents must have protection,” Ryavec
said.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.